Saturday, June 27, 2026

I am thinking about moving and starting my blog fresh?

 

Where I've Been, and What's Worth Saying Now

It's been a long while since anything new went up here, and I want to be honest about why instead of just sliding back in like no time passed.


The short version: work got heavier, and our family went through a run of losses that didn't let up. My mother passed. My wife's mother had a stroke, declined, and passed. My stepfather passed. Then my father passed. Four losses, one after another, with work still demanding full attention through all of it.


The longer version is that grief like that — stacked, with no real space between waves — doesn't leave you without thoughts. If anything, it leaves you with too many, scattered and half-formed, while the part of you that used to organize them into sentences was busy just getting through each day. So the silence here wasn't the absence of material. It was the absence of bandwidth. There's a difference, and I think it matters.


Now that I'm starting to surface again, I'm looking at this blog the way you look at a garage you haven't opened in a year — half the things in here are useful, and a fair amount is just dust and contents that don't reflect where I actually am anymore. Before I start filling it back up, I'd rather ask the people who might still be reading: Does any of this hold value for you?


Here's roughly what's been accumulating, in no particular order:


Rust and embedded systems. I've spent a good stretch of time down in the weeds of embedded Rust — the kind of work where you're fighting register-level behavior on real hardware, not just abstractions. There's a particular kind of satisfaction in getting something to behave correctly at that layer, and I have opinions about where the tooling is heading.


Alternative history aviation. This is the one that surprises people. I build out plausible "what if" aircraft and engine lineages — not just the hardware, but the institutional and wartime decisions that would have had to go differently to produce them. It's part engineering exercise, part storytelling, and it's been one of the more genuinely fun things I do.


Faith, examined rather than just stated. I've been chewing on pieces of what I believe — not the surface-level version, but what it actually asks of me day to day, and where it's been tested. I don't know how much appetite there is for that kind of writing from me specifically, but it's been on my mind enough that it keeps showing up.


Technology in general — energy especially. Solar, fusion, fission, the whole landscape of how we generate and move power. I find myself pulled toward this less as a hobby and more as a genuine belief that many of our other problems become easier to solve once the energy question is handled well.


Free and open-source software. Long-standing interest, not a phase. The principle matters to me as much as the practice.


AI integration and tooling. Where this is actually useful versus where it's noise, and how it fits into the way I already work and build things.


So — that's the inventory. Some of it is technical, some of it is personal, and none of it was written with an audience in mind, which is probably obvious by now.


If you're still reading this blog after the long quiet, what, if any of that, would you actually want to see more of? I'd genuinely rather hear that than guess.




Monday, May 4, 2020

Working at Home, I need a Big Monitor

43 inches with 4k resolution and 120Hz refresh for under $230.

Please forgive my terrible photography but at least you know it is real. The can of Coke Zero is for scale plus I was thirsty.

Update
    Updating the driver and a power down seemed to have resolved the audio issue. I found that annoying at best since I did a reboot and that did not resolve the issue. 

What I do for a living.

   It sure isn't blogging since I do not put enough effort into my blog and no one ever comments on my posts. So what do I do? I write software. To be specific, I am an embedded software engineer at L3Harris in Palm Bay, Florida. Like many companies, they are having people that can work from home. In fact, the current rule is if you can work from home you must work from home. At my office, I have two 1080p 27-inch monitors plus my laptop screen. I often wish for more screen space. When I started working from home, I just had my laptop screen. It just was not going to work for long.  Between my software development environment, Outlook, Skype, and Chrome that tiny laptop screen just was not going to cut it. So I started to shop for monitors.

That is no monitor, it is a TV.

   Back on Black Friday my wife and I got a great deal on a TCL 55-inch 4k TV.  We hooked up our XBox One to it and were really impressed with the picture. I also liked that it supported up to 120Hz refresh rate and after reading some reviews found it had a low latency for gaming. I started to think that it would make a good monitor for gaming on a PC. Sure it would not be as good as a high end 4k monitor but the cost was so low that it might be worth a shot. Then came the work at home order and I needed a monitor or two to make working more productive.

But 55 inches is just too big.

   Yes, I had no room for a 55-inch monitor but TCL made a 43-inch monitor that had the same specs and cost about $100 less. In fact, it was only $218 at Walmart. It is also available at Best Buy, Target, BJs, and Amazon. These are not affiliate links and I make nothing from them. I put them in as a way to make your life easier. 

So how does it work as a monitor for you?

   It is pretty dang good in my humble opinion. For work it is great. I have no serious problems with it. I have not done any advanced testing or used a color spider to calibrate it but I have tried moving windows around and I see no ghosting and the text is very clear. The size is large but not too large. I may make a shelf to raise the monitor up about four inches to improve my line of sight and sitting position. I used to joke that no matter how big the monitor is a software engineer will find a way to use all the space and want more.  I may have been wrong because I think this monitor is about as big as I would ever want. Think of it as four 1080p monitors and it makes a lot of sense.  No, I would not say it is too big but just about right.

Not without some problems.

   The first problem is that you have to use a remote to turn it on and switch it to the computer. It is a TV after all. The second issue has to do with audio. I do not know if this is an issue with my personal notebook or with the TV but sometimes I do not get audio. I cannot get any audio with Chrome playing YouTube video but it seems to work fine with Microsoft Edge. Another issue is that it keeps switching in and out of game mode when I am playing Flight Simulator while in Automatic mode. If you just set it to Game Mode and leave it set when playing games, it is not an issue. The final issue is without a doubt, not the monitor's fault. My laptop is not powerful enough to drive it well at 4k. To really use this TV at the full performance you will need a monster graphics card like a member of the Nvidia 2080 family. 

Is it worth it?

  I have to say yes. If you can get it at $229 and you need a big monitor for working on your computer, I think it is great. If you need a good TV and want to play console games I would also say it is a good choice.  If you want both in your office, then heck yes. The Smart TV software is from Roku which provides a really good interface and it even will do a limited version of Chromecast. 
   How does it work for writing software? I honestly really like it. Some people like to rotate their monitor into portrait mode to get more code on the screen so it is taller than wide. With this monitor, you can have a 1920x2016 window on one side and then have room for two 1920x1080 windows on the other.  I often run my development environment on half the screen and then divide the other half between Outlook, Skype, and a browser.  Hope this helps someone. 


Monday, April 27, 2020

Logitech K400 Keyboard

Working From Home Keyboard review.
Logitech K400.

It is wireless, has a touchpad, and is 10 Keyless but it is just not for me.

    I, like a lot of people, am now working from home. I really did not have a great setup to work from home so I spent some money and created a workspace for myself. Unlike normal times, I cannot just go to Ikea and get a desk. I also did not want to wait for deliveries from Amazon, so I stuck with local stores that offer pickup to minimize my and others exposure. I picked this up at Walmart along with the next two items that I plan on reviewing.

So why did I buy this keyboard?

Honestly, I picked this keyboard for three reasons.
  1. It was at the store.
  2. It was cheap.
  3. When I left my office with my laptop I did not know that I was not coming back for awhile and left two good keyboards on my desk and with the external monitor, it is hard to use the laptop.
As I said, I do not really like this keyboard but that does not mean that it is a terrible keyboard for the right use case. It does have some nice features that may make it a good choice for some.

Features
  1. Wireless. The K400 uses a wireless dongle to connect to your target device.
  2. Small. 
  3. It does not feel too flimsy or cheap.
  4. It has an integrated touchpad, so you do not need a mouse in addition to the keyboard.
  5. Multi-media keys.
  6. Inexpensive, as low as $19.95.
So why don't I like the K400? It all comes down to how I need to use it and personal preferences. If you want this to connect to a Rasberry Pi hooked to your TV or a Media PC, it is a good choice. You can put it next to the couch and control the device. Others may like it because they can put it in their laptop case and have an external keyboard and touchpad to use. 

What I need it for is to write code. I am a software engineer and currently writing Linux device drivers.  I am also a big guy, at almost 2 meters tall. I will be using this at a desk hooked to my work laptop or my personal laptop. So, a lot of the features of this keyboard require trade-offs that I just do not like. 

So what is it that I do not like.

The small size.

The trade-offs to get a small size are just too great for me and the small size offers me no benefit. It is too small and feels cramped to me. Many of the keys are not are full-sized. For example, the enter key and the right shift keys. Also, the home, end, page up, and page down keys require the use of an fn key as well as the function keys. Another trade-off is that it has a very short keystroke and a mushy feel. The height of the keyboard is also not adjustable. 

The integrated touchpad. 

I find it terrible to use. It may be a setting I need to change but it is useless to me. I admit that it has a lot of potentials, if I can get it working well but right now it just does not work for me. It takes forever to move the pointer. Because it is so slow, I have plugged in an external mouse. I do like that it is located to the right, so you are less likely to brush or hit it by mistake which I feel is a real plus.

Not a Bluetooth device.

For many, this is not a problem but a feature. It is simpler to just plug in a USB dongle and not worry about pairing a Bluetooth device. Also, if you are going to use it for gaming, in theory, the property wireless connection offers lower latency than Bluetooth. For me, it is not a benefit. Both my laptops have Bluetooth and I do not find pairing them an issue. So to switch between computers, I have to swap the USB dongle and mouse when I switch between laptops. It would be much simpler if whichever laptop was on would just grab the keyboard and mouse. I could get a KVM switch to handle all this but that is an added expense. 

So should you buy it?

That really depends. If you do not mind the small keys and the feel of the keyboard, it is not a bad choice. If you are going to be writing a lot of code with it, I just think you can find better options.
If it sounds like a good fit, you can buy from Walmart for only $19.95

Other options?

Tom's guide has a review of cheap keyboards that may offer you some better choices if you can get them or have time to have them delivered. 

Stay safe and have a good week.

If you are working from home and have a secure job like I do, please consider donating to your local food bank, homeless shelter, animal Shelter or charity of your choice. 

Thursday, February 6, 2020

The problem with a lack of accuracy in the news.

Shotty news coverage reduces trust in the news. Don't worry this is politics-free.

I am going to discuss one news story on CNN. You can find fiction on every news site but this one is just a perfect example of really bad journalism.

We will start off with the headline.

Grumman X-29: The impossible fighter jet with inverted wings.



So what is wrong with the headline? 

Well for starters the wings are not inverted they are swept forward. They are not mounted upside down or backward. The leading edge of the airfoil is pointing forward as it should. It is in no way inverted. It is also not a fighter. It had no weapons. It had no gun. It was a research aircraft. A plane can not be a fighter if it can not fight.

Well, those are just words does it really matter? 

Words do matter and a journalist's first task is to get the facts straight. the real issue with this is just the laziness of this. My guess is it was researched with Wikipedia and enhanced with a thesaurus. I am sure the author just looked up backward and got inverted and thought it was an impressive word. 

It is a matter of trust.

I can not trust a news site one a subject I am knowledgeable about how can I trust them when I am not knowledgeable enough to cross-check it myself or worse will I trust them to tell me something I need to hear but goes counter to my world view? When this happens a news site has lost its power to inform and educate.

If you want to see it for yourself you can here CNN

Wednesday, February 5, 2020

The problem with a lot of YouTube channels I used to like.

My wife says I am not like other people.


This is a terrible picture of me wearing my Snoop Dog "as in Snoopy" hoodie. It is also a NASA Apollo hoodie. I love tools, I like homesteading and rural life, I like high technology, I like retro technology, I like history, and I like teaching my Sunday School class. But three things I really do not like are politics, left-wing self-loathing,  and right-wing conspiracy nuts!

I have friends that fit into both categories. For an example of left-wing self-loathing just listen to any music by Midnight oil. A bunch of white guys from Australia that sing about how badly the indigenous population was treated. This is true but the made a bunch of money singing about it and maybe the gave some money to help but I bet they made a pretty good living at it as well. I am sure that people feel cleansed by being told how terrible they are but it really helps nothing,

Then you have the right-wing conspiracy theory nuts that think they have the inside dope on how the world really works. You also have the left-wing conspiracy theory folks but I have not been bothered by them of late. This is the problem there is a YouTuber that does some really good projects and reviews. I really like what he does except that he is a prepper. He also has a video on preparing for WW III. He is also a big concealed carry guy and talks about taking his gun with him to dinner with his wife.  I have friends that have guns and that is fine but I do not own a gun and never really needed one.

Planning for World War III is just in my opinion a little crazy. Same thing for trying to defend the US from invasion with your own gun or rebelling against the United States government. 

So here is the problem. Because I watched his video YouTube is suggesting other extremist gun nut and prepper videos to me.

But wait your blog is all over the place as far as subjects.
Yes, that is correct but this blog is more just for me to try and improve my writing skills. I am not trying to make money off of it and my views are in the double digits at best not in the tens of thousands. It is just my interests and I keep politics out of it. In fact, this is going to be the only post I make on this subject but I really wanted to get it off of my chest. Plus I think it is possible to like making and growing things without preparing for the end of the world.

Saturday, February 1, 2020

Cat Free YouTube Channels Den of Tools

Den of Tools




Yes, this is an animated bear doing tool reviews.

  This is heading back to one of my favorite types of YouTube Channel. This is more of a tool review and a good deal-finding channel. I have not seen any projects on this channel yet but that is fine. And yes I love the animated bear.

Scorecard

The Rating uses G, PG, PG-13, and R while the other categories use A for the best that I know of, B for good but others might be better, C is average, D below average, and F is just terrible. 
  • Rating G From what have seen this is totally family-friendly. Red Beard is a family man and it shows.
  •  Quality A I really like the animated bear that is the "host of the show". It really makes for a fun watch. Now when he shoots video the quality goes down like when he does shopping at the store video but I just do not care.
  • Community A The community currently seems on the whole good but has the required flame wars over what brand of tools is the best. Red is not a fan of Snap-On because of the price. He is a best bang for the buck kind of bear.
  • Depth A Red really seems to be on top of things. He seems to have inside contacts at many tool companies and stores like Lowes, HomeDepot, and Harbor Freight. 
  • Overall A  It is very informative and yet fun to watch. 
Where to watch it

  YouTube Den of Tools.
   He also has a website located at www.denoftools.com
   

What I think of this show

I really like this channel. It is fun and informative. It is great fun. What is really great is that Red really keeps hin channel on target. No politics or other off-topic subjects. He does have two other channels that cover gadgets and weight loss. So if you like tools this is a channel you may like.


Tuesday, January 14, 2020

Lost in the Pond. A funny and touching look at ourselves.

Lost in the Pond




And now for something completely different. 

   This channel is not about technology, tools, airplanes, history, or cats. This channel is about being an American. It is a mirror that we can stare at ourselves in and laugh. 
   The creator of this channel is a gentleman from England that moved to the US around 10 years ago with his American wife. He moved not to a big city on the coast but to the midwest. This is about all the things he loves about America and the things he finds really odd. It is a fun look at ourselves through someone else's eyes. 
   If you are not from the United States it is a great way to find out more about the United States. I am sure that many people think that they know all about the US from movies and TV but imagine what we would think of the UK if we based it on Harry Potter, Bennie Hill, and Mr. Bean. 

Scorecard

The Rating uses G, PG, PG-13, and R while the other categories use A for the best that I know of, B for good but others might be better, C is average, D below average, and F is just terrible. 
  • Rating G I have not seen every video but the ones I have seen have been profanity-free with a few beeped out words.  While small children may not get the humor you will not have to turn it off in a hurry if they walk into the room.
  •  Quality B  Production quality is good, It is mostly talking headshot but he is actually a pretty good presenter. I could see him as a good stand up act. 
  • Community B The communities on YouTube Channels are often terrible but this one seems fine. I have not looked a lot into the comments to be honest because it is just pure entertainment to me. 
  • Depth A It is as deep as it needs to be. The creator does research a bit on the subjects that need it. Again this is just a fun channel and not really a how-to or Nerd war channel. It is educational but in a fun way. No test will be given at the end of the videos. 
  • Overall A  It is fun and enlightening all at the same time. Just watch it.
Where to watch it

  YouTube Lost in the Pond
     

What I think of this show

I really like it. It is fun.


Monday, January 6, 2020

Random Thoughts: An Analysis of Macbeth as an Aristotelian Tragedy,

If you are wondering what the heck this is all about or think that I might be kidding let me explain. I am currently taking college courses and I had to write a paper on Shakespeare's Macbeth and analysis it as an Aristotelian Tragedy. I decided to go ahead and post it on my blog.

Spoiler Alert

If you have never seen or read Mcbeth you might not want to read past this point. Frankly, after reading past this point you may never want to read or watch Macbeth.


 
   The complication in the plot of Macbeth is when the witches tell him that he is to be king after he won a great battle. He had really everything that he could have wanted but his greed and ego for more lead him into self-destruction and a murderous rampage. 
   The climax comes when Malcolm kills Macbeth and retakes the throne. The denouement comes when Malcolm states he is going to return the land to peace and order. The denouncement is all very much in line with the old concept of the divine rule of kings being the only correct path. The usurper Macbeth brought mayhem to the kingdom that was only put right when the true king was put back on the throne.
   The principle protagonist and antagonist in Macbeth are one and the same. Macbeth. You could list just about every other character from the witches, Lady Macbeth, Duncan, to Malcolm as antagonists but the primary antagonist was Macbeth or Macbeth’s ego. The witches just provided an excuse for Macbeth and Lady Macbeth’s greed and ambition to take control of their lives, but it was only an excuse. Lady Macbeth encouraged her husband to abandon his morality and duty for power. All the rest of the characters had very good reasons to oppose Macbeth he was after all a murderous tyrant. In the end, the greatest opposition that the protagonist faced was his own ego, greed, and lack of moral compass. He was his own worst enemy.
   The themes in Hamlet are pride, greed, and infidelity. The pride and greed themes are clear but the infidelity has to do with Macbeth not keeping faithful to the true king. The virtue that Macbeth seems to inspire is the virtue of the status quo and of the ruling class. While it is easy to include the Christ-like attributes of humility as well as the blatantly obvious ones of don’t go around murdering people or trusting witches the actual virtue that it may have been created to inspire is not considered a virtue today. When looked at in historical context it is a cautionary tale about the futility of opposing the righteous rule of kings. Macbeth in his arrogance decides he should be ruler and kills the king. When that happens, things go badly for the people and Macbeth and his family. Only when the true heir to the throne regains the throne is all returned to normal. Today we do not believe in the divine right of kings to rule without question, so we see other lessons in virtue like humility and of course not committing murder that apply to current times.  
   Macbeth’s fatal flaw is hubris, his arrogance and compassion are what cause his downfall. Finding two examples of Macbeth’s hubris is difficult because the play is in many ways nothing but his hubris. The clear examples are when he believes the witches when they say he will be king and the second when they tell him that he will not be deposed until the forest moves and cannot be killed by any man born of woman. Both times he took it as proof of his own greatness and invulnerability. 
   It would be easy to select Tomorrow, Tomorrow, and Tomorrow and out dammed spot as examples of using diction to increase the drama. The dialog of the sergeant in Act I scene II is a far less well-known example. In his description of the battle, he references the site of Christ’s crucifixion Golgotha as well as many other metaphorical terms to describe the horrors of the battlefield. The second is in Act V when Macbeth talks of the prophecy that no man born of woman can defeat him and dismisses the threat that Malcolm poses. I wonder what the people of the time thought. Did they wonder how the prophecy and events would resolve the paradox?
   The play starts off with spectacle the opening scene with the witches invokes the supernatural. The use of sound effects of thunder crashing and a storm raging are all images of wonder, terror, and power beyond the understanding of the people of the time. If you think of the time, they lived in such images would inspire awe in the audience.  The descriptive language of the great battles would then use imagination of the audience to provide a spectacle that was more internal. Shakespeare lacked the resources to stage a great battle so he uses descriptive language as a tool to create a spectacle in the audience’s mind. 
   My emotional reaction to this play? Disgust is probably the best description. I do not like it. I do not feel that it is a great example of a classic tragedy because it was completely avoidable, and I find the characters of Macbeth and Lady Macbeth to be completely unlikable and without any redeeming value. Unlike Oedipus Rex where the tragedy was driven by fate Macbeth is driven by greed and a complete lack of mercy and compassion. A passage that moved me. Nothing really did in a positive way. Even the Out Dammed Spot speech is about how the guilt of the murders committed affects Lady Macbeth.  I did not see any sorrow for the victims killed. It all filled me with disgust for the self-indulgent nature of the Macbeths
   Lady Macbeth’s Out Dammed Spot as an example of peripety is in that Lady Macbeth went from saying all that one has to do is wash away the blood to descending into insanity because of guilt over the murders.  I question the idea that she became insane at this point I am tempted to think that instead she regained some sanity and could longer just dismiss her terrible crimes.  Her death could be seen as her act of repentance or even the wages of sin. A dramatic change from her unbridled lust for power at the beginning of the play. 



Thursday, January 2, 2020

Cat Free YouTube Channels: Drachinifel

Drachinifel




Nerds!!! But only military history nerds need to apply.

I am a big fan of history, technology, and all things that fly. That lead me to add Military History to my list of interests.

This channel does a great job of covering the history of not just ships but also the technology used on those ships as well as the evolution of the ships over time. 

Scorecard

The Rating uses G, PG, PG-13, and R while the other categories use A for the best that I know of, B for good but others might be better, C is average, D below average, and F is just terrible. 
  • Rating PG This channel is profanity-free which is nice to see but it is all about military history and that means warfare. That also means people die in none too pleasant ways. It is not graphic but when talking about warfare I believe parental involvement needs to be involved. 
  • Quality B  Production quality is good but a lot of the images are just that images with Drachinifel doing a voice-over. I feel the writing and research is very good. Some of the early videos use a voice synthesizer instead of a human voice and it can be distracting. The information is still good but you may want to see if he has remade that video with a human voice before watching some of the older videos.
  • Community A The communities on YouTube Channels are often terrible but not this one. The community is small and you will see very little drama. Sure you may get into some heated debates about things like the value of the British armored flight decks in World War II or F4U versus F6F as to which was better but nothing really nasty.
  • Depth A Yes this is pretty deep. Not as deep as it could be since we are talking about Military History here but deep enough for a YouTube Channel.
  • Entertainment Value B  This channel is much like the last one I reviewed Lore Reloaded except that instead of doing deep dives into fictional starships Drachinifel does deep dive into real historical starships. If you are into military history you may like it. If not then this channel is probably not for you. It lacks a broad appeal but that is not a terrible thing.   
  • Overall B A good channel if you like naval military history.  I am glad that Drachinifel has dropped the robot voice overs.
Where to watch it

  YouTube Drachinifel
       

What I think of this show

After talking to my wife I increase the scorecard for this channel. I actually really like this channel and it is great. I am really going for nerdy content it would seem. I really like this show and I have learned a lot from it. That being said it is not going to be a show that everyone loves. It is a Naval Military History Channel before you dismiss it might I suggest that you watch this video. 

Friday, January 4, 2019

Cat Free YouTube Channels Lore Reloaded


Lore Reloaded


Nerds!!! Really, if you are not a Science Fiction nerd don't bother.

When I was a small child, I was fed a steady diet of science reality and science fiction. I grew up watching the Apollo missions and Star Trek, the original series. Lore Reloaded is dedicated to Star Trek, Star Wars, Babylon 5, Battlestar Galactica, and other science fiction universes. 

This channel does a deep dive into the universes and treats them as if they are almost real. They look at the ships, the politicians, religion, and the battles in the universes. It fills in a lot of the backstories that add some depth to the stories. 

The amount of research done for the different videos is impressive and it is presented in an entertaining way. 

Scorecard

The Rating uses G, PG, PG-13, and R while the other categories use A for the best that I know of, B for good but others might be better, C is average, D below average, and F is just terrible. 
  • Rating PG-13 The Lore Master can get a bit heated over continuity in the Star Trek Universe. He does sort of bleep things but not well. I feel that this does not add any value to this channel.
  • Quality B  Production quality is good but not great. I feel the writing and research is very good. The Lore Master is a good voice actor in my opinion. The video is limited to slides, a few animations and clips from the games and shows. 
  • Community A The communities on YouTube Channels are often terrible. Lore Remastered is not bad at all. I have seen very little bile. Of course, there is a fair amount of nerd flame wars but they do not descend into nasty battles. 
  • Depth A This is all depth. You will get full tactical specs of Starships and analysis of battles that look like military history. You will also get ethical discussions which I really enjoy. Fiction is a way to look at ideas and ethics without putting real people in danger.  Science Fiction is, at it's best, a future simulator. We can look at different futures and see the benefits and flaws in them. 
  • Entertainment Value C  If you are into the universes covered then you will enjoy it. If you aren't, then watching this channel may bore or you may be inspired to jump on Netflix and watch some of the material covered. 
  • Overall C I really like this show but for some, it will be an F while for others it will be an A+. This is really for those that are into these franchises and will be of little interest to those that are just casual fans or are not fans at all.  The other negative is the use of profanity in the videos even with the bleeping. Again you may not mind it or it may make this channel just for you.
Where to watch it

You can find Lore Reloaded at
  YouTube Lore Reloaded
         Web LoreReloaded.com

What I think of this show

I am a huge science fiction fan and love Star Trek, Star Wars, and most of the other franchises that this channel covers, so it is a fun channel for me and people like me. It has no real educational value outside of philosophical and ethical discussions. I wish that the Lore Master would avoid the profanity since I just do not see any need for it. I find it entertaining and fun and if it is up your alley I suggest you give it a try.

Friday, April 13, 2018

Classic Science Fiction Movies: The Day The Earth Stood Still

Flying Saucer + Giant Robot = GREAT

The Day the Earth Stood Still

Before Data, before R2D2, before Robbie we had Gort.

Putting this movie in context.

It is 1951. Think about 1951 for a little bit. World War II has been over for only six years. In just a few years you have seen the world going from fabric-covered biplanes to a world of jet planes, rockets, and nuclear weapons. During World War II you saw cites in Europe bombed into rubble, the Nazi death camps, the rape of Nanking by the Japanese, the death toll of Iwa Jima and Okinawa, the dropping of nuclear weapons on Japan, and the living skeletons coming back from the Japanese POW camps. After World War II and you thought things were going to be great you live through the Berlin Blockade by the Soviet Union, the Reds have the bomb, the fall of China to the communists and you are in the middle of the Korean War. You have seen more death and destruction than just about any generation.  Heck if you are a kid you still have seen way too much death and destruction. People today are worried about a little global warming and these folks have seen millions die! What is so odd is they seemed to have more hope back then than we do now.

The Opening

A flying saucer lands in Washington DC and the Army surrounds it. Out of the flying saucer comes a man in a spacesuit. He pulls out a device and a nervous soldier shoots him.

The Plot

An advanced civilization try to make first contact with humanity. Just like the Federation from Sar Trek this civilization does not bother to make contact until a plant reaches a certain level of development. In this case, it is the development of nuclear weapons and rockets.  The pilot of the flying saucer is named Klaatu and after being shot and taken to a hospital informs the officials that he must meet with all the leaders of the Earth to give them an important message. He is told that it is impossible. Klaatu escapes the hospital and goes out to learn about humanity. He soon finds a child to be his guide.

My Thoughts

This is considered a class movie with good reason.  Today robots and aliens are common fair but in 1951 they were not common subjects of movies outside of serials like Flash Gordon aimed at kids.  It was all about being rational and honestly practical. In many ways, it almost seems like a model for the Federation in the Star Trek universe but in many ways far more pragmatic. The problem that movie address is that humans seem to be bound and determined to kill themselves with war. While Klaatu's people did not want to see humanity kill themselves but they really didn't see that it was their business to interfere. What they wanted even less was for us to go out into space and mucking up the galaxy. 

Just Say No!


I really was looking forward to a remake of The Day the Earth Stood Still then I read how they reimagined it. NO!!!!!! They made it a story not about war but about ecology. These aliens are going to kill us because we are trashing the planet which is just dumb!  Gee, they don't have the tech to produce power without putting too much carbon in the atmosphere. I know we could just give them the tech. Naw, let's just kill them all.  Really? While wars are often fought over resources it isn't always the case. Tech might not be a solution for war but it sure as shooting is for environmental problems and these guys have the answers but no they have to kill everyone. They could have kept the original story or reverted to the short story it was based on where the robot was the commander of the mission.  Skip the remake and see the original. 

Tuesday, April 3, 2018

Cat Free YouTube Channels: April Wilkerson

April Wilkerson


A show about making stuff.
When I was a kid, I loved to watch PBS shows like The Woodwrights Workshop, This Old House, The New Yankee Workshop, Hometime, and the Victory Garden. Ms. Wilkerson has made a YouTube channel in that same spirit. She did not start out as a super expert but has learned a lot and is tackling some big pretty complex projects.

So what kind of stuff does she make? Everything from little projects like a bath caddy to building a massive workshop. A lot of her projects are practical and would be pretty easy to duplicate. She is not a super craftsman-like Norm Abram from the New Yankee Workshop but she does a great job of showing you how she builds her projects.

Scorecard

The Rating uses G, PG, PG-13, and R while the other categories use A for the best that I know of, B for good but others might be better, C is average, D below average, and F is just terrible. 
  • Rating G This is totally family-friendly.
  • Quality B+  Production quality is very good now, maybe just a notch below broadcast TV. What I really like is that she doesn't do b roll or silly intros to her videos.
  • Community A The communities on youTube Channels are often terrible. Ms. Wilkerson's channel has one of the best communities on the Internet. In fact, it is shockingly good.
  • Depth A- April does a lot of different projects of different skill levels. She is now building a metalworking shop to go with her woodworking shop. She is not a master craftsman but that does not detract from her channel.
  • Entertainment Value A  It is fun, clean, interesting, and informative. Ms. Wilkerson seems like a very likable person and is really fun to watch. Ms. Wilkerson has that traditional southern friendly style that is just really pleasant. She is also good at explaining what she is doing.
  • Overall A I really like this show. If you like home improvement and woodworking shows, watch this
Where to watch it

You can find April Wilkerson at
  YouTube April Wilkerson
         Web wilkerdos.com
Instagram wilker_dos

What I think of this show

I really like it. Ms. Wilkerson is just a fun person to watch. She makes a wide variety of projects. Her current project is a huge shop and she is building it from the ground up.  She also does simple things like a bath caddy. I have no problem recommending this channel to anyone. What is there not to like?

Monday, April 2, 2018

Four Years Without a Post.

Aircraft clock

I didn't have many readers to start with but I am certain I'm down to zero now.

Sometimes life just gets ahead of us and then it seems like it's too late to start again. Shortly after my blog post on the start of World War II, I began a new job. I wanted to keep blogging. There were even a couple of posts (one by my wife) after I started the new job but there just didn't seem to be enough time to keep up with the writing I wanted to do.

Time wasn't the only issue. During the time I was away, I lost two family members in a very short time frame.  Blogging just didn't call me to while I was dealing with two deaths so close together.

Despite the passage of time, I've decided I really want to begin blogging again. No, I don't have more time. In fact, I started a new position at the end of 2016 that has given me an almost three hour round trip commute. I also returned to college after almost 30 years. I may even have less time than I did in 2014 when I stopped blogging. While I am in the middle of a time crunch, I have still felt the pull to begin blogging again. So here I am.

My plan is to start where I left off in 2014, creating posts about my favorite YouTube Channels, Podcasts, and Websites. I may even do some of my longer in-depth opinion pieces on energy policy, technology, space policy and possibly some military technology posts.  My focus will be on shorter posts. The time crunch still exists. But you never know where my interests may lead.

Stay tuned I will make my first new blog post on Tuesday with a short review of a really good YouTube Channel

Friday, March 7, 2014

Is Contract Free the Future?

(Note from David:  Today's post is a guest post from Cindy Siebert.  Cindy is the blogger/owner of Scribbles and Musings.)


Before March 2013, the standard mobile phone plan on all four major carriers consisted of a two-year contract and a subsidized mobile phone. If you wanted to move to another carrier anytime during the two-year period of your contract, you would be charged an Early Termination Fee (ETF). Those ETFs can be more than $300. The high ETFs meant that once you were in a contract, you were essentially stuck with the provider you chose, no matter how bad the service might be. Yes, you could pay full price for the phone and avoid the contract. But you would still pay the same amount for service, which made no contract a very unattractive option. The carriers really wanted you in those contracts.

Then it happened. John Legere, the CEO of T-Mobile, announced that T-Mobile would become the “uncarrier”. The first step T-Mobile took was to drop contracts. You could get a payment plan for your phone, but no tying it to your mobile service. Mobile phone users loved it and the other carriers were worried. While they might have been worried, and they all responded, none of their responses included no-contract options. Finally, almost a year later, that is starting to change.

T-Mobile is having success with it’s uncarrier plan. In the fourth quarter of 2013, T-Mobile added 800,000 new customers. The other carriers see this success and are starting to respond. AT&T is advertising a $45/month mobile plan with no contract. Sprint has just introduced the “Framily” plan which includes no contracts and no early termination fees. Finally, users have lower-cost plan options when they choose to go no contract.

Even with the carriers beginning to embrace the idea of no contracts, there is another stumbling block. The price of unsubsidized phones. Most people cannot easily afford that initial investment of $700 to get a quality smartphone. Yes, you can sell the phone in the future to help cover the cost of your next phone. The lower cost plans will also help make a difference in the future. However, that initial investment is still steep. The good news is that there is help with this on two fronts. T-Mobile, Sprint & AT&T all provide installment plans for their no-contract customers. Another option is less expensive, but not less powerful, phone options.from Google and Motorola. Both Google and Motorola have no-contract phone options for under $400. One option, the Moto G, is only $179.

No contract options have existed in Europe and Asia for years. Until recently, there weren’t any great options for going contract free in the United States. Looks like that’s finally changing. Verizon seems to be the only hold out on the no contract front (and as the larger carrier in the U.S., I don’t expect that to change soon). Even with Verizon holding out, new lower priced plans and less expensive smartphone alternatives, there has never been a better time to go contract free in the U.S. It looks like the future is finally here.


Tuesday, February 25, 2014

Random Thoughts: History, when did World War II start.

Determining the day World War II started is not as simple as you might think. Let's start with the date that most Americans are taught in school. 

December 7, 1941
The attack on Pearl Harbor is the event that brought the US into World War II and is the day that most people in the US think of as the start of World War II. Most Europeans find this amusing, offensive, proof of Americans' ignorance of history and/or a perfect example of American arrogance.  There are actually a lot of good reasons to pick this date, but if you ask most Europeans they will give you the following date.

September 1, 1939, the Invasion of Poland
For Europe, this is the beginning of World War II. It was when Europeanblood was shed when people in Europe started to die and cities burned. The people of Europe spent just over two years fighting before the US officially joined the war. The problem with this date is that it shows as much of a Eurocentric bias, if not more so, than December 7th, 1941, shows a US-centric viewpoint. What about this date?

September 18, 1931, the Invasion of Manchuria

After the invasion of Manchuria came the invasion of China proper in 1937. The Chinese spent years fighting the Japanese before the war in Europe started. Events from this theater of war include, for example, the rape of Nanking, the use of chemical and biological weapons by the Japanese, comfort women and other atrocities that are often overlooked by westerners.  

Other potential dates for the start of WWII.
  • October 3, 1935, the invasion of Ethiopia by Italy. The failure of the League of Nations to stop Italy is often cited as the start of World II. 
  • March 7, 1936, the remilitarization of the Rhineland. In violation of the treaty that ended WWI, Germany reoccupied the Rhineland. This was the European powers' first real chance to stop Hitler. 
  • October 1, 1938, the annexing of the Sudetenland. When the United Kingdom and France handed the Sudetenland over to Germany the world lost the last chance to prevent the war in Europe.
When did World War II start?
I asked my wife that question, she gave me the best answer I have heard in a long time. She thought for a second and said, "that depends on where you were." Of course, history hates answers like that, so I have three dates I feel that are valid.

December 7, 1941
The attack on Pearl Harbor was the event that brought the last of the major players into the war and unified the war in Asia and the war in Europe into one globe-spanning World War. It also brought the United Kingdom into the war in Asia. Before that event, there was a war in Europe and a war in Asia. It is not a big stretch to say that on December 7th, those two wars became one World War. In this case, I say that December 7th was the end of the beginning of World War II.

September 18, 1931
Japan invading Manchuria was the start of the war between China and Japan. That was the first military conflict between the two of the nations that fought WWII. This seems as valid of a start date as any. The invasion of Manchuria could be seen as the beginning of the beginning of World War II. 

My choice for the beginning of World War II is November 11, 1918.
The end of World War I was the start of World War II. In Europe, the decision to not totally defeat Germany combined with the failure to create a just peace was the reason for the rise of the Nazis. Germany did not feel that they were defeated, but rather that they were betrayed. Combine that with the oppressive war reparations that the allies imposed on Germany and you have the perfect conditions for the rise of the Nazi party. In the Pacific, Japan was on the side of the allies and easily captured many of Germany's colonies. The ease of Japan's victories inspired both the massive expansion of the Japanese navy and the rise of militarism in Japan during the 1920s and 1930s. The failure of the allies to truly end World War I did not just cause World War II but was also the reason that World War II ended the way it did. The US believed that a just peace was the only way to secure a lasting peace at the end of World War I. After much discussion, and finally the threat by France and the United Kingdom to not pay the loans the US gave the allies during the war, the US agreed to allow the punishment of Germany. At the end of World War II, the US and other allies were not going to accept anything but the complete defeat of Germany and Japan. After the war, the US worked hard to rebuild Germany and Japan, as well as the rest of western Europe and create a lasting peace and turn enemies into allies.